Quadratic Equations

Chapter 4 · Mathematics · Class 10 32 min read

Why This Matters

Suppose a charity trust wants a prayer hall with a carpet area of 300 square metres, and the length must be one metre more than twice the breadth. What dimensions work? If the breadth is x metres, the length is (2x + 1) metres, so the area is x(2x + 1) = 2x² + x = 300. Notice the — this isn’t a straight-line equation any more. You can’t just rearrange and divide your way out; the squared term changes everything.

Equations like this — where the highest power of the unknown is 2 — are quadratic equations, and they’re everywhere: the path of a thrown ball, the area of a field, the speed of a train that would arrive earlier if it sped up, profit that depends on price. In Chapter 3 each equation drew a straight line. Here, one equation drives a parabola (a U-shaped curve), and that’s why a quadratic can have two answers, one, or none.

This chapter gives you two reliable ways to solve them — factorisation and the famous quadratic formula — and a single number, the discriminant, that tells you in advance how many real answers to expect. Best of all, the formula isn’t something to blindly memorise: you’ll watch it being built from scratch.

The Big Idea

A quadratic equation is any equation that can be written as ax² + bx + c = 0 with a ≠ 0. Its solutions are called roots — the values of x that make the left side equal zero, exactly the zeroes of the polynomial ax² + bx + c. Because a quadratic polynomial has at most two zeroes, a quadratic equation has at most two roots. You find them either by factorising into two linear pieces, or by the quadratic formula x = (−b ± √(b² − 4ac)) / 2a. The quantity under the root, D = b² − 4ac, the discriminant, decides the whole story: D > 0 → two roots, D = 0 → one repeated root, D < 0 → none.

Let’s Break It Down

What counts as a quadratic equation

A quadratic equation in x has the standard form ax² + bx + c = 0, where a, b, c are real numbers and a ≠ 0 (if a were 0 there’d be no x² term and it would just be linear). Examples: 2x² + x − 300 = 0, 2x² − 3x + 1 = 0, 1 − x² + 300 = 0.

The catch: many equations look quadratic but aren’t, and some look cubic but secretly are. Always simplify to standard form first before deciding — bring everything to one side and collect like terms.

Is it really quadratic?

Decide whether each is a quadratic equation: (i) x(x + 1) + 8 = (x + 2)(x − 2); (ii) (x + 2)³ = x³ − 4.

Roots: what we’re hunting for

A real number α is a root of ax² + bx + c = 0 if putting x = α makes it true, i.e. aα² + bα + c = 0. “Root”, “solution”, and “zero of the polynomial” all mean the same thing here. For example, x = 1 is a root of 2x² − 3x + 1 = 0 because 2(1)² − 3(1) + 1 = 0. Since a quadratic polynomial has at most two zeroes, a quadratic equation has at most two roots — keep that ceiling in mind.

Solving by factorisation (splitting the middle term)

The plan rests on one fact: if a product of two things is zero, at least one of them is zero. So if we can write ax² + bx + c as a product of two linear factors, say (px + q)(rx + s), then (px + q)(rx + s) = 0 forces px + q = 0 or rx + s = 0 — two small equations we can each solve.

To factorise, split the middle term bx into two parts whose coefficients multiply to a × c and add to b.

Factorisation by splitting the middle term

Find the roots of 2x² − 5x + 3 = 0.

Back to the prayer hall

The prayer hall has area 300 m² with length one metre more than twice the breadth: solve 2x² + x − 300 = 0 for the breadth x.

Concept check

When you factorise a quadratic and one factor repeats — like (3x − √2)² = 0 — how many distinct roots are there, and what do we call them?

Deriving the quadratic formula by completing the square

Factorisation is quick when nice factors exist — but they often don’t. We need a method that always works. The idea is completing the square: reshape ax² + bx + c so the x-part becomes a perfect square like (x + something)², which we can then undo with a square root.

This derivation is the proof of the quadratic formula. Here it is, step by step.

Theorem (Quadratic Formula). The roots of ax² + bx + c = 0 (a ≠ 0) are x = (−b ± √(b² − 4ac)) / 2a, provided b² − 4ac ≥ 0.

Proof. Start from ax² + bx + c = 0. Since a ≠ 0, divide every term by a:

x² + (b/a)x + c/a = 0.

Now look at x² + (b/a)x. We want to turn this into a perfect square. Recall (x + k)² = x² + 2kx + k². Matching 2k with b/a gives k = b/(2a), so we need to add k² = b²/(4a²). Add and subtract it (adding zero, so the equation is unchanged):

x² + (b/a)x + b²/(4a²) − b²/(4a²) + c/a = 0.

The first three terms are now a perfect square:

(x + b/(2a))² = b²/(4a²) − c/a.

Combine the right side over the common denominator 4a²: b²/(4a²) − c/a = (b² − 4ac) / (4a²). So:

(x + b/(2a))² = (b² − 4ac) / (4a²).

If b² − 4ac ≥ 0, take the square root of both sides (the right side’s denominator 4a² = (2a)² is a perfect square):

x + b/(2a) = ± √(b² − 4ac) / (2a).

Finally subtract b/(2a) and combine:

x = −b/(2a) ± √(b² − 4ac) / (2a) = (−b ± √(b² − 4ac)) / 2a.

That is the formula. This single expression solves every quadratic with real roots — credited to Sridharacharya (around 1025 CE), who derived it by exactly this completing-the-square method.

Using the quadratic formula

Solve x² + 7x − 60 = 0 using the quadratic formula.

The discriminant and the nature of the roots

Look again at the formula: everything hinges on b² − 4ac, the part under the square root. We call it the discriminant, written D = b² − 4ac. It “discriminates” between the three possible situations before you finish solving — because you can’t take the real square root of a negative number.

Theorem (Nature of roots). For ax² + bx + c = 0 (a ≠ 0) with D = b² − 4ac:

Proof. From the formula, x = (−b ± √D) / 2a.

  • If D > 0: √D is a positive real number, so −b + √D and −b − √D are different. The two values (−b + √D)/2a and (−b − √D)/2a are distinct real roots.
  • If D = 0: √D = 0, so x = −b/2a ”± 0” gives the same value twice. There is one value, counted as two equal real roots (a repeated root) at x = −b/2a.
  • If D < 0: there is no real number whose square is the negative D, so √D is not real. Hence the formula yields no real roots.

Geometrically, the graph of y = ax² + bx + c is a parabola, and the real roots are exactly where it crosses the x-axis. The three cases are simply the three ways a parabola can sit relative to that axis:

Three parabolas. The first dips below the x-axis and crosses it at two points (two distinct real roots, D greater than 0). The second just touches the x-axis at one point (two equal real roots, D equals 0). The third stays entirely above the x-axis and never crosses it (no real roots, D less than 0).
The discriminant D = b² − 4ac decides how the parabola meets the x-axis: cuts it twice (D > 0, two distinct roots), touches once (D = 0, two equal roots), or misses it (D < 0, no real roots).
What the discriminant tells you
Discriminant D = b² − 4acNature of rootsParabola vs x-axis
D > 0two distinct real rootscuts the axis at two points
D = 0two equal real roots (one repeated)just touches the axis
D < 0no real rootsnever meets the axis
Finding the nature of roots

Find the discriminant of 2x² − 4x + 3 = 0 and state the nature of its roots.

Discriminant equal to zero

Find the discriminant of 3x² − 2x + 1/3 = 0, find the nature of its roots, and find them if real.

Quadratics in word problems

Many real situations land on a quadratic. The recipe is the same every time: name the unknown, translate the words into ax² + bx + c = 0, solve, then reject any answer that doesn’t fit the situation (a length, age, or count can’t be negative).

A pole on a circular park

A pole is to be erected on the boundary of a circular park of diameter 13 m so that its distances from two diametrically opposite gates A and B differ by 7 m. Is it possible? If so, find the distances from each gate.

Common Mistakes

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

ax² + bx + c = 0 is quadratic as long as it has an x² written in it.

Why it seems right

The x² term jumps out visually, so spotting it feels like enough — and in a tidy textbook equation it usually is.

What actually happens

It is quadratic only if, after simplifying to standard form, the coefficient of x² is non-zero (a ≠ 0). In (x + 2)(x − 2) = x² − 4 the x² cancels and it's linear; in (x + 2)³ = x³ − 4 the x³ cancels and a cubic-looking equation becomes quadratic. Always simplify first.

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

To solve a quadratic you can divide both sides by x to cancel it.

Why it seems right

Cancelling worked all through earlier algebra, so dividing by x looks like a fair, familiar move.

What actually happens

Dividing by x silently assumes x ≠ 0 and throws away the root x = 0. For x² − 5x = 0, factor as x(x − 5) = 0 to keep both roots x = 0 and x = 5. Never divide an equation by the variable.

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

If a product equals any number, say (x − 2)(x − 3) = 6, then x − 2 = 6 or x − 3 = 6.

Why it seems right

The 'set each factor equal' rule is so handy that it feels like it should work for any right-hand value, not just zero.

What actually happens

The zero-product rule needs ZERO on one side: only 'product = 0' forces a factor to be 0. First expand and rearrange (x − 2)(x − 3) = 6 to x² − 5x + 6 − 6 = 0 → x² − 5x = 0, THEN factorise and set factors to zero.

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

If the discriminant is negative, the quadratic equation has no solution at all, so the problem is unsolvable.

Why it seems right

In Class 10 'no real roots' and 'no solution' sound identical, so a negative D feels like a dead end or a mistake.

What actually happens

D < 0 means no REAL roots — the parabola simply never touches the x-axis. That is a perfectly valid answer (e.g. 'no, such a rectangle can't exist'). It signals impossibility within real numbers, not an error in your working.

Quick Check

Which of these is a quadratic equation in standard form ax² + bx + c = 0 with a ≠ 0?

To solve 6x² − x − 2 = 0 by splitting the middle term, which two numbers do you use (they multiply to a × c and add to b)?

The discriminant of a quadratic equation is D = 0. What is the nature of its roots?

In the quadratic formula, what is the expression under the square root sign?

Practice Problems

Easy

easy

Find the roots of x² − 3x − 10 = 0 by factorisation.

easy

Find the discriminant of 2x² − 3x + 5 = 0 and state the nature of its roots.

Medium

medium

Find two consecutive positive integers, the sum of whose squares is 365.

medium

Solve 3x² − 2√6·x + 2 = 0 by factorisation, and state the nature of its roots.

Challenge

challenge

A train travels 480 km at a uniform speed. If its speed had been 8 km/h less, it would have taken 3 hours more to cover the same distance. Find the speed of the train.

challenge

Find the value of k for which the quadratic equation 2x² + kx + 3 = 0 has two equal roots.

Summary

You should now be able to explain:

  • A quadratic equation is one that simplifies to ax² + bx + c = 0 with a, b, c real and a ≠ 0. Always simplify to standard form before deciding if an equation is quadratic.
  • A root (= solution = zero of the polynomial) is a value α with aα² + bα + c = 0. A quadratic has at most two roots.
  • Factorisation: split the middle term bx into parts that multiply to a × c and add to b, factor into two linears, then set each factor to zero (this needs zero on one side).
  • Quadratic formula: x = (−b ± √(b² − 4ac)) / 2a, derived by completing the square — it always works when real roots exist.
  • The discriminant D = b² − 4ac gives the nature of the roots: D > 0 → two distinct real roots; D = 0 → two equal real roots; D < 0 → no real roots. These match a parabola cutting, touching, or missing the x-axis.
  • In word problems, translate to a quadratic, solve, and reject answers (negative lengths, ages, speeds) that don’t fit the situation.

What’s Next

Quadratics were about one squared unknown. Next, in Arithmetic Progressions, we step back to patterns of numbers that grow by a fixed step — like 5, 8, 11, 14, … — and find neat formulas for the nth term and the sum of many terms. (And watch for a surprise: adding up an AP often leads straight back to a quadratic equation.)