Turning Tides: 11th and 12th Centuries
Why This Matters
Think about the sea. The tide comes in, then it goes out. The water keeps moving. Some waves crash and pull things away. Others bring new things to the shore.
The 11th and 12th centuries CE were like that for India. They were a time of big change. Old kingdoms grew weak. New kingdoms grew strong. Some invaders came from far away, took treasure, and left. Later, other invaders came, won battles, and stayed to rule.
That is why historians call this period a turning point — a time when the direction of history changed. (A “turning point” means a moment after which things are never quite the same again. Like the moment a cricket match turns when a key wicket falls.)
But here is the part many people forget. Even while wars went on in the north, the rest of India did not stop. In the south, the Cholas built huge temples and sent ships across the sea. Scholars wrote great books on maths and astronomy. Traders carried Indian goods to China and Southeast Asia. So this chapter is a story of two things happening at once: destruction in some places, and brilliance in others.
In this chapter we will keep things balanced and factual. We will face the hard parts honestly, but we will also see how much India created and learned during these same two centuries.
The Big Idea
The 11th and 12th centuries were a “turning of the tide” in Indian history. Two waves of invaders came from the north-west. The first, Mahmud of Ghazni, only raided and left. The second, Muhammad of Ghor, came to rule, and his generals stayed on to start the Delhi Sultanate. Yet at the very same time, powerful Indian kingdoms — above all the Cholas in the south — were at their height, building grand temples, ruling the seas, and keeping art, trade and learning alive.
Let’s Break It Down
To follow this big period, it helps to see the order of events first. Figure 4.1 below lays the main events along a timeline, so you can see what happened when before we dive into each one.
Notice how the south (the Cholas, above the line) and the north-west (the raids, below the line) are happening in the same years. Keep that in mind as we go. We will travel across India — south, then back to the north — meeting these powers one by one.
The Cholas — masters of the seas
Let us begin in the deep south, in present-day Tamil Nadu. Here rose one of the greatest kingdoms in all of Indian history: the Cholas. Their capital cities were Thanjavur (also spelt Tanjavur), Gangaikondacholapuram, and Kanchipuram.
From 985 CE, a king named Rajaraja Chola I ruled for about thirty years. He was a strong and clever ruler. He conquered parts of present-day Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. His inscriptions (writings carved on stone or copper) say he won “islands of the sea” — which most historians think means the Maldives. He also conquered the northern part of Sri Lanka.
His son, Rajendra Chola I, also ruled for nearly thirty years. He pushed the empire even further. He sent armies all the way north to present-day Odisha and Bengal, near the river Ganga. To celebrate this, he took the proud title “Gangaikonda” — which means “the Chola who brought the Ganga”. He even built a new capital city and called it Gangaikondacholapuram (the city of the Chola who brought the Ganga).
But the Cholas are most famous for one special thing: their navy (a navy is a kingdom’s fighting force at sea — its warships and sailors). Very few Indian kingdoms ever built a strong navy. The Cholas did. Figure 4.2 shows how far their sea power and trade reached.
Why did the navy matter so much? Because of trade. Under the Cholas, sea trade with China grew rich. Rajendra even sent a friendly group (a diplomatic mission) all the way to China. But there was a problem. One important sea route passed through the Strait of Malacca — a narrow strip of sea between Malaysia and the Indonesian island of Sumatra. (A strait is a thin channel of water joining two larger seas, like a narrow lane joining two big roads.) A kingdom called Srivijaya controlled that strait. This created competition with the Cholas.
So around 1025 CE, Rajendra sent his navy across the Bay of Bengal. It defeated the Srivijaya forces and captured their capital. But notice this carefully: Rajendra did not try to keep that land or rule it. It was a one-time punishing strike to protect trade. After making his point, his fleet came home.
Let us see how to think about why this expedition happened.
Why did Rajendra Chola send his powerful navy all the way across the sea to attack Srivijaya, even though he did not want to rule it?
- Start with what the Cholas valued most here: trade. Sea trade with China was making the Cholas rich, so keeping that trade open was very important to them.
- Now find the obstacle. The key sea route passed through the Strait of Malacca, a narrow channel controlled by the Srivijaya empire. Whoever held that strait could block or tax ships passing through.
- See the clash. Srivijaya’s control of the route created competition and got in the way of free Chola trade. Trade and power were tied together.
- So Rajendra used his navy to remove the threat. Because his only aim was to keep the trade route open — not to grab faraway land — he struck once, won, and returned. That is why it was a punishing strike for trade, not a war of conquest.
One more thing shows how grand the Cholas were: their temples. Rajaraja built the famous Brihadisvara temple at Thanjavur. It is a masterpiece — one of the wonders of Indian building. Figure 4.3 shows its main parts.
Here is a “nothing is a given” question. The temple tower is made of giant stone blocks, with no cement to glue them. So why did it not fall down? Because the builders made the tower like a pyramid — wide and heavy at the bottom, getting narrower as it rises. Each block presses down on the one below it, and gravity holds the whole thing together, like a neat stack of bricks. The wide base spreads the weight over the ground so it does not sink. That clever shape is why this stone giant has stood for a thousand years.
This relies on an idea from earlier classes — that the bottom of a tall structure must be strong and wide. Here is a quick reminder:
Back home, the Cholas also did big public works — useful things built for everyone. They made roads for travel, and tanks, wells, canals and even man-made lakes to store water for farming. This is what a caring, well-run kingdom does.
But no kingdom lasts forever. The Cholas fought too many wars with their neighbours — the Western Chalukyas, the Pandyas, and the rulers of Sri Lanka. These endless wars drained their treasury (the kingdom’s store of money). By the 13th century, the Chola empire had shrunk, and the Pandyas finally absorbed it.
Rajendra Chola defeated Srivijaya but did not stay to rule it. Why does this show his real aim was protecting trade, not conquering land?
Because if he had wanted the land, he would have occupied it and ruled it. Instead he struck once to remove the threat to his trade route through the Strait of Malacca, then brought his fleet home. A trade-protecting strike is a quick, one-time blow; a war of conquest means staying to rule. He did the former.
Other kingdoms across India
The Cholas were not alone. Many other Indian kingdoms flourished at this time. You do not need every detail, but it helps to know the land was full of busy, creative powers — not empty or weak.
Let us travel around the map for a moment:
- In eastern India (Bengal), the Sena dynasty became strong, with their capital at Nadia. They supported Hindu thought and poets like Jayadeva, who wrote the famous Gitagovindam about Krishna and Radha.
- Further down the coast, in Kalinga (roughly today’s Odisha), the Eastern Gangas grew into one of the most stable powers of the east. They began building the great Jagannatha temple at Puri, and later the Sun temple at Konark.
- In the Deccan and the south, the Kakatiyas (capital at Orugallu, today’s Warangal) built strong forts and supported Telugu literature, and the Hoysalas of Karnataka built temples famous for their amazingly detailed carvings — the temples at Belur and Halebidu are now UNESCO World Heritage monuments.
- In central India (Malwa), the Paramaras had a famous scholar-king, Bhoja. He built a huge lake near present-day Bhopal (the city’s name even comes from “Bhojpal”) and wrote books on many subjects, from architecture to medicine.
The lesson is simple: India in these centuries was full of powerful kingdoms doing great things, especially building temples and supporting writers and scholars.
The raids from the north-west: Mahmud of Ghazni
Now we travel to the north-west, where a different story unfolds. To understand it, we must start with a mountain pass.
For thousands of years, invaders and traders entered India from the north-west through the Khyber Pass — a gap through the high Hindu Kush mountains. (A pass is a low gap through a mountain range; it is the easy doorway through a wall of rock.) Whoever guarded the pass could block invaders. For a long time, a dynasty called the Hindu Shahis guarded it well.
Then, in present-day Afghanistan, a powerful Turkic dynasty rose: the Ghaznavids. (Turkic means peoples and cultures from Central Asia, the vast region north of Afghanistan stretching towards Turkey and Siberia.) Their capital was Ghazna (today’s Ghazni in Afghanistan), which is why their famous ruler is called Mahmud of Ghazni.
In the early 1000s CE, Mahmud defeated the Hindu Shahis. This opened the door to the plains of north India. Over his life, Mahmud led about seventeen raids into India. Each time, the pattern was the same. He marched in fast, with daring cavalry (soldiers on horseback) and archers on horses. He looted treasure, often destroyed rich temples, took prisoners — and then carried the loot back to Ghazni.
He attacked the wealthy temple-city of Mathura in 1018. He attacked Kannauj. And in 1026, he marched to Somnath in Gujarat, then a busy seaport, and destroyed its great Shiva temple, taking its huge treasures.
It is important to be honest about what these raids meant. They brought not only loss of treasure but also the killing of many people and the capturing of prisoners, including children, who were taken away to be sold. Mahmud’s own writers describe him as a powerful but ruthless general. We should face this part of history clearly, while remembering that we cannot blame anyone living today for what happened a thousand years ago.
There is one bright thread even here. A Persian scholar named al-Biruni travelled with Mahmud’s campaigns around 1017 CE. Instead of just fighting, al-Biruni learned Sanskrit, read Indian books, and talked with Indian scholars. He then wrote a huge, careful survey of Indian religion, philosophy, science and mathematics — comparing Indian ideas with Greek and Islamic ones. His book is one of our best windows into the India of that time.
And Indian science itself did not die. Around the same period lived Bhaskaracharya (Bhaskara II), born in 1114, one of India’s greatest mathematicians and astronomers. His book Lilavati taught maths through fun riddles and problems, and his works on algebra and astronomy were studied for centuries.
Now here is the most important point about Mahmud. He took the loot and left. He did not try to rule India. He never set up a lasting kingdom east of Punjab. Remember this — because the next invader was very different.
Mahmud of Ghazni won many battles in India but never ruled it. What does the phrase 'he raided and left' mean here?
It means he came in only to loot. Each time, he attacked, took treasure and prisoners, destroyed some temples, and then went back home to Ghazni. He did not stay to govern the land or build a kingdom in India. “Raided and left” = struck for plunder, then withdrew — the opposite of staying to rule.
North Indian kingdoms and the Battles of Tarain
Time passed. Mahmud’s Ghaznavid empire was attacked from many sides and fell apart. In its place rose a new power from Ghor (today’s Ghor), a mountain region in Afghanistan to the west of Ghazni. Their leader was Muhammad, the sultan of Ghor — so we call him Muhammad of Ghor (or Muhammad Ghori). (The word sultan is an Arabic word meaning “authority” or “power”; it came to mean a king or sovereign ruler.)
Muhammad of Ghor wanted more than loot. He wanted land. He brought parts of Punjab and Sindh under his rule. But when he tried to push into Gujarat in 1178, he was defeated at the foot of Mount Abu by the Chaulukya kingdom — in one telling, by the brave queen Naikidevi, who led the army with her young son.
Meanwhile, in nearby Rajasthan, a powerful Rajput dynasty had risen: the Chahamanas, better known as the Chauhans. (Rajput refers to warrior clans of north-western India.) Their kings ruled Delhi, Haryana, parts of Punjab and Uttar Pradesh, and most of Rajasthan, from their capital at Ajayameru (today’s Ajmer). Their most famous king was Prithviraja III — known today as Prithviraj Chauhan.
Now two ambitious powers — Muhammad of Ghor and Prithviraj Chauhan — were bound to clash. They met at a place called Tarain (modern Taraori in Haryana). This led to two famous battles.
- First Battle of Tarain, 1191 CE: Prithviraj Chauhan defeated Muhammad of Ghor. Ghor had to retreat.
- Second Battle of Tarain, 1192 CE: But within a year, Muhammad returned with a much larger army. This time, after fierce fighting, Muhammad won, and Prithviraj was captured and killed.
Let us work through why the second battle went differently from the first.
In 1191 Prithviraj Chauhan defeated Muhammad of Ghor, yet in 1192 Muhammad won. What changed between the two battles of Tarain?
- Look at the first battle (1191). Prithviraj’s forces beat Ghor and forced him to retreat. So Ghor was clearly beatable — the Indian side was strong.
- Now ask what a defeated but determined invader does. Muhammad of Ghor did not give up. He went back, gathered a much larger and better-prepared army, and returned within a year.
- See the result of that return. In the Second Battle of Tarain (1192), with his bigger force and after fierce fighting, Muhammad defeated Prithviraj and captured him.
- So the deciding change was not that the Indian side was weak — it had won once. It was that Ghor came back stronger and more determined the second time. One defeat did not stop him, and that persistence, plus a larger army, turned the tide in 1192.
This second battle was a true turning point. After it, Muhammad of Ghor captured Delhi.
Why is the Second Battle of Tarain (1192) seen as a bigger turning point than the first?
Because the first battle (1191) was just an Indian victory that pushed Ghor back for a while. The second battle (1192) was won by Ghor, and it led to him capturing Delhi and opening the way for lasting foreign rule in the north. The second one changed the direction of history; the first only delayed it.
The start of the Delhi Sultanate
Here is the key difference between the two invaders. Look at Figure 4.4, which shows how power kept changing hands in the north.
Unlike Mahmud of Ghazni — who only plundered and withdrew — Muhammad of Ghor wanted to keep the land. Though he himself returned to Ghazni, he left behind trusted commanders to hold and grow his gains. The most important of these was his general Qutb-ud-din Aibak.
This is the big change. After 1206, Aibak founded the Delhi Sultanate — a Muslim kingdom ruled from Delhi, which would last for centuries. (You will study it in detail in Grade 8.) For the first time in this period, foreign rule did not just raid and leave; it stayed.
By the way, this is also where the name “Delhi” comes from. Under the Chauhans, the city was called Dhillika, which slowly became Dhilli, and then Delhi.
Let us compare the two invaders side by side, because this contrast is the heart of the whole chapter. Figure 4.5 sums it up, and the table below lays out the details.
| Point | Mahmud of Ghazni | Muhammad of Ghor |
|---|---|---|
| When | Early 11th century (about 1000–1027 CE) | Late 12th century (about 1175–1206 CE) |
| Came from | Ghazna (Ghazni), Afghanistan | Ghor, Afghanistan |
| Main aim | Loot and plunder | Land and rule |
| What he did | About 17 raids; looted temples like Somnath | Won the Second Battle of Tarain (1192); took Delhi |
| Did he stay? | No — returned to Ghazni each time | Yes — left his generals to rule |
| Long result | Raids passed, no lasting kingdom in India | Delhi Sultanate began under Aibak |
Governance, trade and culture: what continued
So far this section has been full of war. But remember the Big Idea: a lot of good things kept going at the same time.
Governance. Every powerful king needed a large army, and armies cost a lot — soldiers, weapons, horses, elephants. So kingdoms needed an efficient administration to collect taxes and tributes. One change came with Muhammad of Ghor’s system: it was more centralised and gave officers temporary land assignments in return for collecting revenue and giving military service. This idea would grow further under the Delhi Sultanate.
Trade. Even with all the fighting, India’s trade with China and Southeast Asia kept growing. Coins and pottery from across the sea have been found at Indian ports. Powerful merchant guilds (groups of traders working together) carried goods within India and far beyond. But the real backbone of the economy was always agriculture — rice and barley from the Ganga plains, saffron from Kashmir, spices from Kerala, cotton from western India. Many rulers built irrigation works to protect crops from the ups and downs of the monsoon rains.
Culture and thought. Art, literature, science and religion all flourished. We already met Bhaskaracharya in maths and Bhoja the scholar-king. Huge temples went up across India — like the Kandariya Mahadeva and Lakshmana temples at Khajuraho, built by the Chandellas. Great thinkers appeared too: Ramanujacharya in the south taught a path of bhakti (loving devotion to god), and Basaveshwara (Basavanna) in Karnataka founded the Lingayat movement, which rejected caste differences and taught that all people, men and women, have equal spiritual worth. He even set up an anubhava mantapa — a hall where people of every background could come together to discuss life and values.
And India’s influence reached far overseas. In Cambodia, the Khmer king Suryavarman II built Angkor Wat in the 12th century — the largest religious monument in the world, first dedicated to Vishnu, with carvings from the Ramayana and Mahabharata, built in a style much like south Indian temples.
So the real lesson of this turbulent period is resilience — the power to keep going, keep building and keep learning, even through conflict.
Common Mistakes
Mahmud of Ghazni and Muhammad of Ghor were basically the same — two invaders who conquered and ruled India.
They came from nearby places (both in Afghanistan), had similar-sounding titles, and both attacked India around the same broad period, so it is easy to blur them into one.
They were very different. Mahmud of Ghazni only raided for loot and went home to Ghazni each time, leaving no kingdom in India. Muhammad of Ghor came to conquer land; his generals stayed and began the Delhi Sultanate. One left, the other stayed — that is the whole point of the chapter.
While invaders attacked the north, the rest of India was weak, broken and did nothing important.
The chapter spends a lot of time on the invasions, and battles and destruction stick in our minds more than peaceful achievements, so it feels like that was the whole story.
At the very same time, the Cholas were at their peak in the south, building the Brihadisvara temple and ruling the seas. Great temples rose at Khajuraho, Belur and Puri. Scholars like Bhaskaracharya and saints like Ramanujacharya were active. Most of India remained outside the invaders' reach and kept thriving.
Indian kingdoms always lost to the invaders because they were not strong enough to win.
We remember the final outcome — Ghor winning at Tarain and Delhi falling — and assume the Indian side must have been weak all along.
Indian kingdoms won many times. Prithviraj Chauhan defeated Ghor in the First Battle of Tarain (1191), and Ghor was beaten in Gujarat in 1178. Ghor only succeeded because he kept coming back with bigger armies. The Indian defeats came from persistence by the invader and from kingdoms often fighting each other, not from being weak.
The Cholas built a navy mainly to conquer faraway lands and add them to their empire.
They did send a navy across the sea and defeat Srivijaya, which looks like a conquest, so it seems like they wanted that land.
Their navy was mainly about protecting trade. The Srivijaya strike was a one-time blow to keep the Strait of Malacca trade route open. Rajendra did not stay to rule Srivijaya — he won and brought his fleet home. Trade, not conquest of distant lands, was the goal.
Quick Check
What was the main difference between Mahmud of Ghazni and Muhammad of Ghor?
Why are the Cholas remembered as 'masters of the seas'?
Who won the First Battle of Tarain in 1191, and what happened next?
Practice Problems
Easy
Name the two Chola kings who took the empire to its peak, and the famous temple one of them built.
The two kings were Rajaraja Chola I (ruled from 985 CE) and his son Rajendra Chola I. Rajaraja built the Brihadisvara temple at Thanjavur, a masterpiece of stone architecture. Rajendra is famous for his navy and for sending a sea expedition against Srivijaya.
In which years were the First and Second Battles of Tarain fought, and who won each one?
- First Battle of Tarain — 1191 CE: won by Prithviraj Chauhan, who defeated Muhammad of Ghor.
- Second Battle of Tarain — 1192 CE: won by Muhammad of Ghor, who returned with a larger army and defeated Prithviraj.
The second battle was the turning point that opened the way for Ghor to capture Delhi.
Medium
Explain in your own words why the 11th and 12th centuries are called a 'turning point' or 'turning of the tide' in Indian history. Give one example of change and one of continuity.
They are called a turning point because the direction of history changed: for the first time in this period, foreign invaders did not just raid and leave — they came to stay and rule. Muhammad of Ghor’s general Qutb-ud-din Aibak founded the Delhi Sultanate, the start of lasting foreign rule in parts of the north. That is the big change.
But there was also continuity — things that kept going as before. For example, trade with China and Southeast Asia kept growing, art and temple-building continued (Khajuraho, Belur, the Chola temples), and scholars and saints like Bhaskaracharya and Ramanujacharya stayed active. So both change and continuity happened together — which is exactly why it is a “turning of the tide”, with the water both pulling away and bringing new things.
Mahmud of Ghazni won battle after battle in India but never built a kingdom here, while Muhammad of Ghor's victories led to the Delhi Sultanate. What does this tell us about the difference between raiding and ruling?
It tells us that winning battles is not the same as ruling a land. Raiding means coming in, taking what you want, and leaving — which is exactly what Mahmud did, returning to Ghazni after each of his roughly 17 raids. He gained huge treasure but built nothing lasting in India.
Ruling means staying to govern the land — collecting taxes, keeping order, and holding the territory over time. Muhammad of Ghor aimed for this. He left his generals, especially Aibak, to hold and grow his gains, and that led to the Delhi Sultanate. So the lasting change came not from who won more battles, but from who chose to stay and rule rather than raid and leave.
Challenge
A friend says, 'During the 11th and 12th centuries, India was just being destroyed and could create nothing.' Using examples from the chapter, write a short, balanced reply.
I would gently disagree, because the picture is only half true. Yes, there was real destruction in the north-west: Mahmud of Ghazni’s raids looted and destroyed temples like the one at Somnath, took prisoners, and brought great suffering, and later Ghor’s conquest began foreign rule in parts of the north. We should not hide these hard facts.
But at the very same time, India was creating wonderful things. In the south, the Cholas were at their peak — Rajaraja built the Brihadisvara temple at Thanjavur, and Rajendra ran a navy and rich sea trade reaching China. Great temples rose at Khajuraho, Belur and Puri. Scholars like Bhaskaracharya wrote important books on maths and astronomy, and saints like Ramanujacharya and Basaveshwara taught new ideas about devotion and equality. India’s temple style even shaped Angkor Wat in faraway Cambodia.
So a balanced answer is this: some regions suffered destruction, while most of India kept building, trading and learning. The real lesson of the period is resilience — the power to keep creating even through conflict. Destruction and brilliance happened side by side.
Summary
- The 11th and 12th centuries CE were a turning point in Indian history — old powers fell, new ones rose, and foreign rule began in parts of the north.
- In the south, the Cholas were at their peak. Rajaraja I built the Brihadisvara temple at Thanjavur; Rajendra I ran a powerful navy, sent a sea expedition against Srivijaya, and grew rich sea trade with China.
- Mahmud of Ghazni (early 1000s CE) made about 17 raids, looted treasure and destroyed temples like Somnath, took prisoners — but always returned to Ghazni and did not stay to rule.
- Muhammad of Ghor wanted land. He lost the First Battle of Tarain (1191) to Prithviraj Chauhan but won the Second Battle of Tarain (1192) and captured Delhi.
- Unlike Ghazni, Ghor’s generals stayed: his general Qutb-ud-din Aibak founded the Delhi Sultanate (after 1206) — the start of lasting foreign rule in the north.
- Even so, most of India remained outside the invaders’ reach, and Indian kingdoms often won battles and sometimes joined together against invaders.
- At the same time, trade, art, temple-building, science and religious thought all flourished (Khajuraho, Bhaskaracharya, Ramanujacharya, Basaveshwara), and Indian culture spread abroad (Angkor Wat).
- The big lesson of the period is resilience — India kept creating and learning even through conflict.
What’s Next
We have seen India as a land of many kingdoms, many faiths and many languages, all changing through a turbulent time. In the next chapter, India, a Home to Many, we will look more closely at how so many different peoples, beliefs and ways of life came to share one land — and how that rich variety became one of India’s greatest strengths.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was Mahmud of Ghazni and why did he raid India?
Mahmud of Ghazni was a sultan from Ghazni (in present-day Afghanistan) who raided India 17 times between 1000 CE and 1027 CE. He came mainly to take wealth — gold, silver and jewels from temples and royal treasuries — to fund his empire and armies back home. He did not want to permanently rule India; he took the loot and returned each time.
What were the Battles of Tarain and why were they important?
The Battles of Tarain were two battles fought in 1191 and 1192 CE near a place called Tarain (in present-day Haryana) between Muhammad of Ghor (from Afghanistan) and Prithviraj Chauhan (the Rajput king of Delhi and Ajmer). Prithviraj won the first battle in 1191. But in 1192, Muhammad of Ghor came back better prepared and defeated Prithviraj. This second battle was a turning point because it opened northern India to Muslim rule and led directly to the founding of the Delhi Sultanate.
Why is the Brihadisvara temple at Thanjavur famous?
The Brihadisvara temple was built by the Chola king Rajaraja I around 1010 CE in Thanjavur (Tamil Nadu). It is famous for being one of the largest and tallest temples in all of India — the tower (vimana) rises about 66 metres high. It was also built entirely of granite without using any cement, which is a remarkable engineering achievement. It is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
How did the Chola empire become so powerful in the 11th century?
The Chola kings Rajaraja I and his son Rajendra I built a very strong army and a powerful navy. With their navy they controlled sea trade routes and even launched an expedition across the Bay of Bengal to Southeast Asia. They collected taxes from conquered kingdoms, used the wealth to build grand temples, and encouraged trade and crafts. Their empire at its peak covered most of southern India and parts of Sri Lanka.
How did the Delhi Sultanate begin?
After Muhammad of Ghor defeated Prithviraj Chauhan at the Second Battle of Tarain in 1192 CE, his armies took control of Delhi and other parts of northern India. When Muhammad of Ghor was killed in 1206 CE, one of his generals, Qutb-ud-din Aibak, took power and founded the first dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate. This marked the beginning of over 300 years of Sultanate rule in India.