Money and Credit

Chapter 3 · Social Science · Class 10 26 min read

Why This Matters

Think about everything you did with money in the last week. You may have bought a snack at the shop. Your family may have paid the electricity bill. Maybe someone sent ₹500 to a cousin on a phone app. Maybe a shopkeeper said “pay me next month, it’s okay.” Every one of these is a money transaction. Money is so much a part of daily life that we never stop to ask the obvious question: why does this little piece of paper, or this number on a phone screen, hold any power at all?

Here is the strange truth. A ₹500 note is just paper. The paper itself is worth almost nothing. You cannot eat it, wear it or build with it. Yet a farmer will hand you a whole sack of wheat for it, and a shopkeeper will hand you a phone for ten of them. Why? That puzzle is the heart of the first half of this chapter.

The second half is about something even more powerful, and more dangerous: credit, which simply means a loan. Borrowing can lift a person up — a small business owner takes a loan, completes a big order, and earns much more than before. But borrowing can also pull a person down — a farmer takes a loan, the crop fails, and the debt slowly swallows everything they own. The same tool, two completely opposite endings.

So this chapter is really about trust and risk. It teaches you how money quietly holds society together, how banks work, why some people get cheap loans while the poor are forced to pay crushing interest, and how clever new ideas like self-help groups are trying to fix that unfairness. These are not just exam topics. They are the rules of the money world you are about to step into as an adult.

The Big Idea

Money is anything that everyone agrees to accept in exchange for goods and services. Its great gift is that it removes the “double coincidence of wants” — the near-impossible need, in a barter system, for two people to each want exactly what the other has. Modern money takes two main forms: currency (notes and coins, accepted because the law and the Reserve Bank of India stand behind it) and bank deposits (money you keep in a bank, which you can spend by cheque or by phone using UPI). Banks keep only a small part of deposits as cash and lend the rest, earning the gap between the high interest they charge borrowers and the low interest they pay depositors. Credit (a loan) can help a borrower earn more, or trap them in debt — it depends on the risk in the situation. Every loan comes with terms of credit: interest rate, collateral, documents and how it is repaid. Credit comes from the formal sector (banks and cooperatives, watched by the RBI, low interest) and the informal sector (moneylenders and traders, watched by no one, very high interest). The poor, having no collateral, are often pushed to costly informal lenders — and self-help groups are one way to give them cheap loans by making the group itself the guarantee.

Let’s Break It Down

Why money was invented — the problem with barter

Long before money existed, people traded by barter. Barter means swapping one good directly for another — my goat for your rice, my pot for your cloth. No money changes hands.

Barter sounds simple, but it hides a huge problem. Imagine a shoe-maker who has made some shoes and now wants wheat. In a barter world, he cannot just “buy” wheat. He has to find one very special person — a wheat farmer who also happens to want shoes at that exact moment. The farmer must want to sell wheat and want to buy shoes, both at the same time.

This double condition has a name: the double coincidence of wants. “What one person wants to sell is exactly what the other wants to buy.” If the farmer wants cloth and not shoes, the deal collapses. The shoe-maker must keep searching, perhaps for days, perhaps forever.

This is the reason barter breaks down, and it is exactly the kind of leap NCERT states quickly and moves past. So let us slow down and see it clearly. Figure 3.1 below shows the trap, and then how money springs it open.

A two-panel diagram comparing barter and money. In barter the shoe-maker must find one person who at the same time has wheat and wants shoes; the farmer has wheat but wants clothes, and the cloth-seller wants shoes but has no wheat, so no deal happens. With money the shoe-maker sells shoes to anyone for money and then buys wheat from the farmer.
Figure 3.1 — Two panels. Panel (a), Barter: the blue box is the shoe-maker, who has shoes and wants wheat. To trade, he must find ONE person who at the same time HAS wheat AND WANTS shoes. The two people shown both fail this test — the farmer has wheat but wants clothes (not shoes), and the cloth-seller wants shoes but has no wheat — so each marks no deal. This rare, almost impossible match is the double coincidence of wants. Panel (b), Money: the shoe-maker simply sells shoes to anyone for money (first green arrow), then uses that money to buy wheat from the farmer (second green arrow). The farmer never has to want shoes at all. Because money is accepted by everyone, each person only needs to find a buyer and then a seller — never one perfect match. That is why money is called a medium of exchange.

Now look at panel (b). With money, the impossible condition disappears. The shoe-maker sells his shoes to anyone who wants shoes and gets money. Then he takes that money to any wheat farmer and buys wheat. The wheat farmer does not need to want shoes at all — he is happy to take money, because he can spend that money on whatever he wants.

Money works as a medium of exchange — a middle step that everyone accepts. It splits one hard trade into two easy ones: first sell for money, then buy with money. That is the whole reason money was invented, and it is one of humanity’s most useful ideas.

Modern forms of money — currency

Before coins, people used grains and cattle as money. Then came metal coins of gold, silver and copper. These had a strange feature: the coin was made of something valuable in itself. A gold coin was worth its weight in gold.

Modern currency — the paper notes and coins in your pocket — is completely different. A ₹100 note is not made of anything precious. The paper is worth a fraction of a rupee. So here is a question that should genuinely puzzle you, the kind NCERT states as a given: why does a worthless piece of paper work as money?

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

A currency note is valuable because it is made of some precious or special material.

Why it seems right

Old money was made of valuable stuff — gold and silver coins really were worth their weight in metal. So it feels natural to assume the note must also contain something precious, or be 'backed' by gold locked in a vault somewhere.

What actually happens

A modern note has no precious material and no gold behind it. It works only because the law makes the rupee a payment no one in India may refuse, and the Reserve Bank of India issues and guarantees it. So everyone accepts it — and that shared trust, not the paper, is its real value.

Let us answer the “why” properly, because it is genuinely interesting. A note is accepted for two linked reasons. First, the law backs it. In India, only the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) can issue currency notes, and it does so on behalf of the central government. By law, the rupee is legal tender — meaning no one in India can legally refuse a payment made in rupees. Second, because the law backs it, everyone trusts it. I accept a ₹100 note from you happily, because I am completely sure that the next shopkeeper will accept it from me. And that shopkeeper accepts it because he is sure the next person will too.

So trust holds itself up in a loop, as Figure 3.2 shows.

A diagram explaining why a paper note works as money. In the centre is a ten-rupee note, which is just paper with no gold behind it. The law backs it (no one may refuse a rupee payment) and the RBI issues and guarantees it, so everyone accepts it, and a dashed arrow loops the shared trust back to keep it going.
Figure 3.2 — In the centre sits a ₹10 note, labelled as just paper, with no gold behind it. Two blue boxes above it explain what gives the worthless paper its power: (1) the law backs it — by Indian law no one may refuse a payment in rupees, so it is legal tender; (2) the RBI guarantees it — only the Reserve Bank of India may issue notes, on behalf of the government. Blue arrows run from both to the note. A green arrow then drops to the bottom green box: so everyone accepts it — I take the note because I am sure the next person will take it from me too. The dashed green arrow loops that acceptance back up, showing that the shared trust keeps itself going. The lesson: the paper is worthless; the trust behind it is everything.

Modern forms of money — deposits with banks

Currency is only one form in which people hold money. The other big form is deposits with banks.

Because you can withdraw this money on demand — that is, whenever you ask for it — these are called demand deposits. Now here is the clever part that makes a deposit behave like real money, not just savings sitting idle.

You can spend a demand deposit without ever touching cash. The oldest way is a cheque. A cheque is simply a paper that instructs your bank to pay a stated amount from your account to the person named on it. Suppose Salim the shoe-maker must pay his leather supplier. He writes a cheque. The supplier deposits it into his own account. Over a day or two, the money moves from Salim’s account to the supplier’s account — and not a single rupee of cash was handled.

Today there are far faster ways. You can pay straight from your bank account using your phone through UPI (scanning a QR code at a shop), or by bank-to-bank transfer, debit cards, or POS swipe machines. (After the demonetisation of November 2016, when the old ₹500 and ₹1,000 notes were declared invalid, the government pushed hard for these digital methods.)

Because demand deposits can be used to make payments — just like cash — they count as money in the modern economy, alongside currency. But notice: this only works because of banks. Without banks there would be no deposits, no cheques and no UPI. Modern money — both currency and deposits — is tied to the banking system.

Here is a quick check to make sure the idea has landed:

Concept check

Why is the money in your bank account (a demand deposit) counted as 'money', when only the cash in your hand looks like real money?

How banks work — lending out deposits

Now for a question that sounds almost magical. The bank owes all that deposit money back to its depositors. So how can it lend most of that same money to other people? Is it not giving away money it does not really own?

NCERT states the mechanism in one line and moves on, but it is worth understanding fully, because it explains the entire banking world. Banks keep only a small part of the deposits as cash — in India, roughly 5%. They lend out the large rest.

How is this safe? Here is the key insight: not everyone withdraws their money at the same time. On any single day, only a few of the bank’s thousands of depositors come to take out cash. Most leave their money sitting in the bank. So the bank only needs to keep enough cash on hand to pay the few who show up. That small kept-back amount is called the cash reserve. The huge remainder can be safely lent out.

This is the bank’s whole business, and it is how it earns money. The bank charges borrowers a higher rate of interest on loans than the lower rate of interest it pays depositors. The difference between the two is the bank’s main income. In this way the bank sits in the middle, connecting two groups: people who have spare money (depositors) and people who need money (borrowers). Figure 3.3 traces the full loop.

A diagram showing how a bank uses deposits. Depositors put in 100 rupees. The bank keeps about 5 rupees as a cash reserve because only a few depositors withdraw on any one day, and lends out about 95 rupees to borrowers, who repay with higher interest. Depositors are paid lower interest. The gap between the two interest rates is the bank's income.
Figure 3.3 — Follow the money from left to right. Depositors put in their spare cash, say ₹100, which flows into the bank (blue arrow). The bank splits it two ways. To the left (green): it keeps a small reserve, about ₹5 — only around 5% — because only a few people withdraw on any one day, not everyone at once; depositors are paid a LOWER interest and can withdraw on demand. To the right (red): it lends out the big rest, about ₹95 — around 95% — to borrowers, who repay the loan with a HIGHER interest. The orange box at the bottom states the bank's income: interest from borrowers (higher) minus interest paid to depositors (lower). That gap is how the bank lives.

Two faces of credit — Salim and Swapna

Now we move to credit, which is just the formal word for a loan. Credit is an agreement where a lender gives the borrower money, goods or services now, in return for a promise to pay later.

Credit is everywhere in economic life, and it is neither simply “good” nor simply “bad”. The same loan can have two completely opposite endings. NCERT tells two stories to show this — Salim and Swapna — and they are worth knowing well.

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

All credit is good because it gives you money — or the opposite, that all credit is bad because debt is dangerous.

Why it seems right

Both feel true from one example. If you have seen a relative grow a business with a loan, credit looks purely good. If you have seen a family ruined by a moneylender's debt, it looks purely evil. People generalise from the one story they know.

What actually happens

Credit is a tool, and its result depends on the RISK of the situation and whether there is support if things go wrong. In a low-risk situation with a sure return, credit helps; in a high-risk situation with no cushion, the very same loan can trap the borrower.

Here are the two stories side by side. Salim is a shoe-maker. Two months before the festival season, he gets a big order — 3,000 pairs of shoes. To finish in time he needs leather and extra workers, but he lacks the cash now. So he takes credit: the leather supplier gives leather on a “pay-later” promise, and a trader pays him in advance for 1,000 pairs. Salim completes the order on time, makes a good profit, and easily repays everything. Credit lifted him up.

Swapna is a small farmer who grows groundnut on three acres. She borrows from a moneylender to pay for seeds, fertiliser and pesticides, hoping the harvest will repay it. But pests destroy her crop. She cannot repay, so the debt grows. Next year she borrows again, but even a normal harvest cannot clear both the old and new loans. She is caught in a debt trap and must sell part of her land. Credit pushed her down.

Figure 3.4 places the two journeys next to each other so the contrast is impossible to miss.

A two-panel diagram of the two faces of credit. Salim takes a loan for a big festival shoe order, completes it on time, makes a profit, and repays easily, so credit lifts him up. Swapna takes a moneylender loan for her crop, the crop fails from pests, the debt grows, and she is caught in a debt trap and must sell land, so credit pushes her down.
Figure 3.4 — Two side-by-side journeys of the same tool, credit. Panel (a), green, is Salim: he takes a loan for leather and extra workers, completes the big festival order on time, makes a good profit, and repays the loan easily — credit increased his earnings, so he ends up better off; the risk was low because the order was sure. Panel (b), red, is Swapna: she takes a moneylender loan for her crop, but pests make the harvest fail; she cannot repay, the debt grows, and a new loan cannot clear the old one; she falls into a debt trap and must sell part of her land — credit left her worse off; the risk was high and there was no support. The blue strip at the bottom states the lesson: same tool, opposite results — it depends on the risk and whether there is support if things go wrong.

So whether credit helps or harms depends on two things: how risky the activity is, and whether there is some support (like insurance, or a cushion of savings) if things go wrong. Salim’s order was nearly certain; Swapna’s harvest depended on the weather and the pests. That is the real lesson — not “credit good” or “credit bad”, but “it depends on the risk”.

The terms of credit

When you take a loan, you do not just receive money. You agree to a set of conditions. These conditions are called the terms of credit. There are four of them, and you should know each.

Let us learn the four terms through NCERT’s example of Megha, who takes a ₹5 lakh loan from a bank to buy a house. Figure 3.5 lays out all four around her loan.

A diagram of the four terms of credit using Megha's house loan. Interest rate: the extra you pay, here 12 percent a year. Collateral: an asset like the house papers the lender keeps as security. Documentation: papers like job and salary records proving you can repay. Mode of repayment: how and when you pay back, here monthly over 10 years.
Figure 3.5 — In the centre is Megha's loan of ₹5 lakh, with the four terms of credit around it. (1) Interest rate (blue, top-left): the extra you pay on top of the borrowed money — here 12% per year. (2) Collateral or security (blue, top-right): an asset you own that the lender keeps and can sell if you do not repay — here the house papers. (3) Documentation (green, bottom-left): papers proving you can repay — here Megha's job and salary records. (4) Mode of repayment (green, bottom-right): how and when you pay it back — here in monthly instalments over 10 years. The note at the bottom states that these four together make up the terms of credit, and they differ a lot from one lender to another.

The four terms are: the interest rate (Megha’s is 12% a year); the collateral; the documentation required; and the mode of repayment (Megha pays monthly over 10 years). Two of these deserve a closer look.

Collateral is an asset the borrower owns — like land, a house, a vehicle, livestock or bank deposits — which they pledge to the lender as a guarantee. If the borrower fails to repay, the lender can sell the collateral to get the money back. Megha’s collateral is the papers of the new house; the bank keeps them until she has fully repaid, then returns them.

This explains why lenders demand collateral: it protects them. If the loan is not repaid, they are not left with nothing. But — and this is a crucial point for the rest of the chapter — collateral is also the reason the poor struggle to borrow from banks. A person with no land, no house and few possessions has nothing to pledge. So banks turn them away.

The terms of credit are not fixed. They vary a lot from one lender to another, and depending on who is borrowing. A rich borrower with land and a steady salary gets easy terms — low interest, simple paperwork. A poor borrower with no collateral gets tough terms, or no loan at all. That difference is exactly what the next section is about.

Formal and informal sources of credit

Loans in India come from two very different worlds. Knowing the difference between them is one of the most important ideas in this chapter.

The formal sector means loans from banks and cooperatives. The informal sector means loans from moneylenders, traders, employers, landlords, relatives and friends.

The single biggest difference between the two sectors is supervision. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) supervises all formal lenders. It checks that banks keep their cash reserve. It also makes banks report how much they are lending, to whom, and at what interest rate. Importantly, the RBI insists that banks lend not only to big businesses but also to small farmers, small industries and small borrowers.

The informal sector has no supervisor at all. No one watches the moneylenders. They can charge whatever interest they like — often shockingly high (in your textbook, one lender charges 5% per month, which is 60% a year). There is no one to stop them from using unfair or harsh means to recover their money.

Figure 3.6 sets the two sectors side by side and then shows the trap that keeps the poor stuck with the costly one.

A comparison of formal and informal credit and why the poor are stuck with informal lenders. Formal sector: banks and cooperatives, supervised by the RBI, low interest, asks for collateral and documents, used mostly by the rich. Informal sector: moneylenders and traders, no supervision, very high interest, often no collateral, used mostly by the poor. A trap chain shows the poor have no collateral, banks refuse them, they are pushed to high-interest lenders, and stay poor.
Figure 3.6 — A side-by-side comparison plus the trap. Panel (a), green, FORMAL sector: lenders are banks and cooperatives; supervised by the RBI (which checks how much they lend, to whom, at what interest); interest is LOW; they ask for collateral and documents; mostly used by richer households — cheap, but hard for the poor to reach. Panel (b), red, INFORMAL sector: lenders are moneylenders, traders, landlords, employers and friends; supervised by NO ONE; interest is VERY HIGH; often asks for no collateral; mostly used by poor households — easy to reach, but costly and risky. The bottom strip shows the trap step by step: the poor have no collateral, so banks refuse them, so they are pushed to high-interest lenders, so they stay poor and the cycle repeats. The cure is to spread cheap formal credit to the poor — for example through self-help groups.

Here is the comparison in a table you can revise from quickly:

Formal vs informal sources of credit
AspectFormal sectorInformal sector
Who lendsbanks and cooperativesmoneylenders, traders, employers, landlords, relatives, friends
Supervised bythe Reserve Bank of Indiano one — no supervision at all
Interest ratelow and reasonableusually very high
Collateral & documentsusually requiredoften not required
Mainly used byricher householdspoorer households
Recovery methodsfair; records keptcan be unfair or harsh; few records

Why does all this matter so much? Because high-cost informal credit hurts the poor and the country. When a large part of your earnings goes to repay a high-interest loan, you are left with little for yourself, and you can sink into a debt trap. People who might have started a small business do not, because borrowing is too costly. So cheap and fair credit is crucial for development. That is why banks and cooperatives must lend more, and why that cheaper credit must reach the poor — not just the rich, who already get most of it.

Self-help groups for the poor

We have hit a hard problem. The poor need cheap formal credit the most — but banks refuse them, because they have no collateral and cannot provide the paperwork. Moneylenders will lend to them (they know the borrowers personally), but at crushing interest. How can we break this trap?

One powerful answer is the Self-Help Group (SHG). The idea is simple and clever, and it is mainly built around poor rural women.

A typical SHG has 15 to 20 members from one neighbourhood. They meet regularly and each member saves a small amount — usually ₹25 to ₹100, whatever they can manage. These small savings are pooled into one common fund. From this fund, members can take small loans at an interest much lower than a moneylender’s. Then, after a year or two of regular saving, something important happens: the bank agrees to give a bigger loan to the whole group.

But wait — the members still have no collateral. So why does the bank now trust them? This is the heart of the idea, the “why” you should carry away. The group itself becomes the guarantee. The loan is given to the group, not to one person. And the group takes responsibility for repayment. If any one member fails to repay, the other members follow it up seriously. Because of this group pressure and support, banks are willing to lend to poor women in SHGs even without any collateral. Figure 3.7 shows the whole mechanism.

A diagram of how a self-help group gives the poor collateral-free credit. Step one: 15 to 20 poor members, usually women, save a small amount regularly. Step two: the savings pool into one fund from which members take small low-interest loans. Step three: after a year or two the bank lends a bigger loan to the whole group. The key idea is that the group itself is the guarantee, since other members chase any non-repayment, so the bank trusts the group without collateral.
Figure 3.7 — Three steps plus the key idea. Step 1 (blue): 15 to 20 poor members, usually women from one neighbourhood, meet regularly and each saves a little — about ₹25 to ₹100 (the row of dots are the members). Step 2 (yellow): the savings are pooled into one common fund, from which members can take small loans at interest far lower than a moneylender's. Step 3 (green): after one to two years of regular saving, the bank gives a bigger loan to the GROUP — not one person — for self-employment such as buying seeds, a sewing machine or cattle; the arrow from the bank points to the group. The red box at the bottom states the key idea: the group IS the guarantee. There is no land or building to pledge, but if one member fails to repay, the others chase it up, so the bank trusts the group — and the poor get cheap loans without collateral.

SHGs do even more than solve the credit problem. Because the women meet regularly, the group becomes a platform to discuss and act on health, nutrition, domestic violence and other issues. It helps women become financially self-reliant. The famous example beyond India is the Grameen Bank of Bangladesh, started by Professor Muhammad Yunus, which lends mostly to poor women and won its founder the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize. It proved that poor women are reliable borrowers who can run successful small businesses when given fair credit.

Common Mistakes

You have already met three misconceptions inside the chapter (currency needs precious material; all credit is good or all is bad). Here are three more that students often trip over.

A first mistake is to confuse a cheque with cash itself.

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

A cheque is a kind of money, like a special note.

Why it seems right

A cheque does move money from one person to another, and you hand it over just like you would hand over cash, so it feels like a form of money in your hand.

What actually happens

A cheque is only a paper instruction to the bank to move money from your account. The money is the demand deposit sitting in your account; the cheque is just the message that shifts it. If your account is empty, the cheque is worthless.

A second mistake is about who the RBI looks after.

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

The Reserve Bank of India supervises all lenders, including moneylenders.

Why it seems right

The RBI is the country's top banking authority, so it seems natural that it must oversee everyone who lends money in India.

What actually happens

The RBI supervises only the FORMAL sector — banks and cooperatives. There is no organisation that supervises informal lenders like moneylenders. That is exactly why they can charge any interest they like and use unfair means to recover loans.

A third mistake is about why the poor end up with costly loans.

⚠️ Common mistake
What students think

The poor borrow from moneylenders because moneylenders are cheaper or more convenient than banks.

Why it seems right

Moneylenders are nearby, know the borrower personally, need no paperwork and give cash quickly, so it looks like a sensible, easy choice.

What actually happens

The poor go to moneylenders mainly because banks refuse them — they have no collateral and cannot provide documents. Moneylenders are actually far more expensive. The poor are pushed into costly informal credit, not choosing it because it is better.

Quick Check

Test yourself with these. Read each question, decide your answer, then tap to see if you were right.

In a barter system, what makes trade so difficult?

Why is a modern currency note, made only of paper, accepted as money?

A bank receives ₹100 in deposits. Roughly how much does it keep as cash reserve, and why is that safe?

Which of these is the MAIN reason banks are unwilling to lend to the poor?

In a self-help group, why is a bank willing to lend even though the poor women have no collateral?

Practice Problems

Try each problem yourself first. Write your answer like you would in the exam, then reveal the model answer to compare.

Easy

easy

How does the use of money make exchange easier than barter? (3 marks)

easy

Look at a ₹10 note. The line at the top says 'I promise to pay the bearer the sum of ten rupees' and it is signed by the Governor of the RBI. Explain why a paper note with no gold behind it still works as money. (3 marks)

Medium

medium

How do banks mediate between people who have surplus money and people who need money? In doing so, how do banks earn their income? (4 marks)

medium

'Whether credit helps or harms a borrower depends on the situation.' Explain this using the examples of Salim and Swapna. (5 marks)

medium

What are the differences between formal and informal sources of credit? Why must we expand formal credit in India? (5 marks)

Challenge

challenge

In India, about 80% of farmers are small farmers who need credit for cultivation. (a) Why might banks be unwilling to lend to small farmers? (b) From what other sources can they borrow? (c) Give an example of how the terms of credit can be unfavourable for a small farmer. (d) Suggest ways small farmers can get cheap credit. (6 marks)

challenge

What is the basic idea behind self-help groups for the poor, and how do they solve the problem of collateral? Explain in your own words. (5 marks)

Summary

You should now be able to explain each of these in your own words:

  • Money is anything generally accepted as payment. It is a medium of exchange that removes the double coincidence of wants that makes barter so hard.
  • Modern money has two forms: currency (notes and coins, accepted because the law and the RBI back it) and bank deposits (which you can spend by cheque or UPI). Both depend on the banking system.
  • A currency note works not because of any precious material but because of shared trust created by the law (legal tender) and the RBI.
  • Banks keep only a small cash reserve (about 5%) and lend the rest, because not everyone withdraws at once. They earn the gap between the high interest charged to borrowers and the low interest paid to depositors.
  • Credit can help (Salim) or trap (Swapna). The outcome depends on the risk in the situation and whether there is support in case of loss.
  • The terms of credit are the interest rate, collateral, documentation and mode of repayment. They vary from lender to lender.
  • Credit comes from the formal sector (banks and cooperatives, RBI-supervised, low interest) and the informal sector (moneylenders and traders, unsupervised, very high interest).
  • The poor lack collateral, so banks refuse them and they are pushed to costly moneylenders. Self-help groups fix this by making the group itself the guarantee, giving the poor cheap, collateral-free credit.

What’s Next

You now understand how money and credit move within a country — between savers, banks and borrowers. The next chapter, Globalisation and the Indian Economy, zooms out to the whole world. You will see how goods, services, money and even jobs now flow across countries: how foreign companies set up here, how Indian products reach faraway markets, what “Multinational Corporations” are, and how this connecting-up of economies (globalisation) has helped some Indians while making life harder for others. Just as credit had two faces in this chapter, you will find globalisation, too, has winners and losers — and the same question returns: how do we make sure its benefits reach everyone fairly?

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the double coincidence of wants and how does money solve it?

In a barter system you can only trade if the other person wants exactly what you have AND has exactly what you want — both needs must match at the same time. This is called a double coincidence of wants, and it is very hard to achieve. Money solves this completely: you sell your goods for money, then use that money to buy anything from anyone, without needing the other person to want your goods.

How do banks create credit and make money?

Banks take deposits from people who are saving, then lend most of that money out to borrowers at a higher interest rate. Banks keep only a small portion (the reserve) to handle daily withdrawals. The money lent out gets deposited again in other accounts and lent again — this cycle creates more credit than the original deposit. Banks earn profit from the gap between the interest they pay depositors and the higher interest they charge borrowers.

What are the terms of credit and what is collateral?

Terms of credit are the conditions attached to a loan — the interest rate, how long you have to repay, when payments are due, and what collateral is needed. Collateral is an asset (like land, a house, gold, or crops in the field) that a borrower pledges to the lender. If the borrower cannot repay, the lender takes the collateral. This protects the lender but creates risk for the borrower.

What is the difference between formal and informal sources of credit in India?

Formal sources are banks, cooperative societies, and other institutions regulated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). They charge lower interest and follow rules that protect borrowers. Informal sources are moneylenders, traders, landlords, or friends and family — they are not regulated, so they can charge very high interest and use unfair methods to recover money. The poor often cannot access formal credit and are forced into informal loans.

What are self-help groups (SHGs) and how do they help poor people?

A self-help group is a small group of 15 to 20 poor people (usually women from the same village) who save a small amount regularly and pool their savings. When a member needs a loan, the group lends from this pool at a low interest rate, without demanding collateral. This gives the poor access to credit without moneylenders. SHGs also build confidence, decision-making, and financial independence, especially for women.